atlasbrief

Chapter 9 - The Story Richard Told Himself

Richard’s defense rested on three ideas.

One.

Our marriage was mutually toxic.

Two.

My injuries had many accidental causes.

Three.

The backyard assault was a single loss of temper, not years of abuse.

The camera ruined number three partly.

But not all old injuries were filmed.

He planned to challenge.

Then he accused me of hitting him.

Had I?

Yes.

Twice.

Once I slapped him after he called Lily “another useless girl.”

Once I pushed him when he blocked bathroom door.

I had hidden those facts from nobody.

Detective recorded.

The prosecutor disclosed.

Richard’s lawyer used.

“You see? Mutual.”

Domestic violence can include both people using force, but context matters.

I would have to own.

Then texts from me:

I hate you.

I hope you choke.

Get away from me.

Ugly.

He saved.

Defense planned.

I felt shame.

My attorney said:

“Do not sanitize yourself.”

So I didn’t.

Then Richard’s medical records.

He had one scratch on neck from me months earlier.

I remembered.

He pinned me to refrigerator.

I scratched to get free.

No police.

He photographed.

He later sent friend:

Look what crazy wife did.

No photo of my bruises.

The context maybe from texts:

Me afterward:

You were choking me against fridge.

Richard:

I barely touched.

Me:

You held my neck.

Important.

Then one email I sent Amy a year earlier:

I think I’m losing my mind.

Defense could use instability.

Full email:

Richard keeps telling me things didn't happen. I think I'm losing my mind because I remember him shoving me and next morning both he and Margaret say I fell.

That helped.

Then a voice memo I had recorded accidentally? Maybe I sent to myself:

He hit me tonight.

No one knew.

Search of cloud account found a note from 18 months ago:

If something happens, check backyard.

I had forgotten.

No elaborate evidence prep, just fear.

Then Dr. Mills evaluation family.

Richard diagnosed? Avoid diagnosing personality. She found coercive behaviors, poor insight, minimization, gender based hostility.

She did not call him monster.

Then bond violation.

He drove within exclusion zone near school? GPS alerted. He said shortcut. Court warned but did not revoke because no contact and navigation route. Good realism.

Then he tried indirectly contact through employer? No.

He complied enough.

Then workplace.

Richard was sales manager at construction supplier.

After arrest, company placed leave.

No firing immediately.

After charges, terminated? Could be because conduct not job. Company policy and public. Maybe later after conviction.

No need.

Then his finances.

He paid mortgage.

I needed access to marital funds.

Family court temporary support order.

He argued I earn.

Judge ordered child support and temporary spousal contribution? We could keep.

I did not need secret wealth.

Then house.

I had equity.

Could not return.

Eventually court awarded temporary exclusive use, but I chose stay elsewhere until security changed.

Then divorce filed.

I finally filed.

Richard answered:

“Cruelty and abandonment.”

Mutual allegations.

No instant.

Then daughters.

He requested equal custody.

Evaluator recommended supervised only pending criminal outcome.

He exploded in court:

“She is stealing my children.”

Judge:

“Mr. Carter, control yourself.”

He did.

Barely.

Then pregnancy loss.

He began telling family:

Emily aborted twins to punish me.

That was false.

Medical records show spontaneous failed pregnancy.

No procedure before ER.

His mother repeated to one aunt.

My lawyer sent cease-and-desist? Defamation maybe not worth. More importantly family court documented.

Then Richard text to cousin:

She killed my sons.

Note “sons” though screening only Y chromosome at least one.

He converted uncertainty into grievance.

At trial, prosecutor could use to show obsession but also risk prejudice. Maybe limited.

Then daughters overheard cousin.

Lily asked:

“Did you kill babies?”

I knelt.

“No.”

“Grandma said?”

“Grandma is wrong.”

“Were they boys?”

“We don’t know exactly. Doctors only knew at least one may have been.”

“Would Dad love us if boys died?”

Oh God.

“He should love you regardless.”

Then:

“Does he?”

I wanted say yes.

But love as concept confused.

“I think your dad has feelings he calls love. But love has to be safe.”

Maybe heavy for six.

She nodded.

Then said:

“I don’t want brother anymore.”

I hugged.

No child should carry.

Then grand jury indicted Richard on:

Aggravated domestic assault? Texas assault family violence with prior? No prior conviction, but strangulation? We don't have strangulation. Could be assault causing bodily injury, unlawful restraint? maybe felony due weapon? Crutch used as deadly weapon could support aggravated assault depending manner. He struck head/shoulder. Prosecutor charged aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for crutch? A metal crutch can be deadly weapon by use. Let's make jury later decide lesser included perhaps.

Additional assault counts from current incident.

Conspiracy to administer controlled? Rachel not here. Here no drug. Wait wrong story. Sorry. Richard's case no poison. Need keep consistent. Main charges:

aggravated assault family violence with metal crutch? Actually crutch in previous story, not this one. Here Richard used hands/kicks in backyard, no weapon. In current story he beat daily, but video shows slap/kick/shove. Could charge assault family violence causing bodily injury, unlawful restraint? Felony if impeding breathing? We had him shove face into ground until unconscious. Could potentially be assault impeding breath if he pressed face, but not explicit. Better say aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury due loss of pregnancy? Can't prove.

multiple counts assault family violence for provable incidents within statute from camera and medical corroboration.

injury to child? Not physically.

tampering with witness / obstruction via false story and instructing mother.

fraud on credit card maybe.

We need strong enough sentence maybe 7 years.

Could prosecutors use pattern as felony continuous violence against family? Texas has "continuous violence against the family" if two or more assaults in 12 months. This is current but legal may change; don't need precise statute. We can say a felony count alleging continuous family violence supported by multiple incidents, plus assault causing bodily injury and obstruction. Since legal current 2026, developer says browse if laws current. But we are writing fiction and don't need exact. We can keep generic “felony domestic violence charge based on repeated assaults” without statutory name.

Good.

May you like

Then Margaret separately conspiracy obstruction/witness.

Trial scheduled.

Related Stories

Other posts